In an article in Ny Teknik, published May 28th, KTH researchers Elisabeth Ekener Petersen and Göran Finnveden debate the different demands put on fossil fuels compared to renewable fuels. The authors rely on results from their recently finished f3 project Social and socioeconomic impacts from vehicle fuels that came to the conclusion that there are substantial negative social impacts from fossil fuels, at the same levels as for biofuels, and that the country of origin seemed to be of more importance that the type of fuel.

Find the article here (in Swedish).

Other posts

Recording of this year’s program conference available

Each year, the collaborative research program Renewable transportation fuels and systems carries through a conference presenting results from the…

Read more »

News | 2020-12-01

Gröna näringar blir grönare med alkoholer

Klimatskadliga utsläpp från arbetsmaskiner kan närma sig noll med förnybara alkoholer som drivmedel i stället för diesel visar nya…

Read more »

News | 2020-06-26

Six new projects are announced

Hydrogen in multi filling stations. Car travels and paths to climate neutrality. LBG in shipping. Efficient…

Read more »

News | 2020-06-16

Landsbygdens röster om hållbar mobilitet i ny rapport

Staden och landsbygden presenterar mycket olika förutsättningar för hållbara transporter. En central skillnad är att mobilitet på landsbygden kanske inte…

Read more »

News | 2020-02-13

See all news »